1. Sally Yates is an Obama appointee serving as acting Attorney General. She was fired yesterday, Monday, January 30.
2. Yates was the attorney general for Trump because she was the Attorney General for Obama at his time of presidency, and so she then was the attorney general for Trump. She would have stayed attorney general for Trump until she was replaced by another attorney general of Trump's choice. Trump's action to choose a different attorney general was delayed by democrats so Yates was the attorney general until Trump could find someone else.
3. Yates was fired because she instructed Department of Justice Employees not to defend Trump's executive order on immigration. She betrayed the Department of Justice by refusing to enforce a legal order designed to protect the citizens of the United States.
4. She said she is responsible for ensuring that the positions that the Department of Justice taeks in court will remain consistent with the institutions obligation to always seek justice and stand for what is right she also says that her job is to make lawful decisions based on the facts presented to her, and based on the facts she is not convinced that the executive order is lawful or consistent with her responsibilities.
Tuesday, January 31, 2017
Friday, January 27, 2017
SB 007
In the Senate
Senators: Hunter J. Gronau, Zachariah J. Fries, Chance M.
Olson
Introduce the following bill, which was referred to the
committee on January 24th, 2017.
To Establish: SB 007
1.
Be it enacted by the Senate and
2.
House of Representatives of the
3.
State of South Dakota in
4.
Congress assembled, that
Section 1
5.
A bill that would charge out-of-state
6.
sportsmen
an additional fee to hunt
7.
and fish
in South Dakota.
Section 2
8.
An Act to Charge Out-of-State Residents
9.
18 years of age and up, a fee of 500 dollars,
10.
and children under the age of 18 will be
11.
charged a flat rate of 200 dollars, to allow
12.
access to
hunting and fishing rights for a
13.
year, in the state of South Dakota. Along
14.
with this fee, you must also obtain a South
15.
Dakota hunting and fishing license from the
16.
South Dakota Game Fish and Parks. License
17.
granting
permission to hunt and fish must
18.
be carried with the hunter or fisherman at
19.
all
times, as a hard-copy or electronic picture.
20.
Valid
signature must be present on license.
21.
Background checks will be done on all people
22.
applying for an out-of-state license.
Section 3
23.
If any hunting or fishing laws are violated,
24.
the South
Dakota Game Fish and Parks will
25.
enforce a punishment as it is seen according
26.
to the
law. If need be, the South Dakota
27.
attorney general will also become involved
28.
to enforce a correct punishment.
Section 4
29.
If a background check is run and a person is
30.
found with a felony, they will not be issued
31.
a license to hunt and fish in the state of South
Dakota.
32.
If any person is found hunting or fishing
33.
without a correct license to hunt in the state
34.
of South Dakota, a warning will be issued
35.
and the person will have to pay a fee of 750
dollars.
36.
If fine is payed a license will then be issued.
37.
If a person with a warning is found hunting
38.
or fishing without a correct license to hunt in
39.
the state
of South Dakota, the person will be
40.
made to
pay a 1000 dollar fine and will be
41.
issued a
class 3 misdemeanor. If fee is payed, a license
42.
will be issued.
43.
If 3 license violations occur, the person’s
hunting
44.
rights for the state of South Dakota will be
45.
revoked for
5 years and a fee of 2,000 dollars will be issued.
46.
If false information or identification is given,
47.
the person will automatically be summoned
48.
for a
public hanging.
49.
If a person who has had 3 warnings and
50.
whose license rights have been revoked for
51.
5 years
violates the license regulations again,
52.
will not
be allowed to hunt or fish in South
53.
Dakota
again, and a summons for a public
54.
hanging
will be issued.
President’s Signature
_______________________
Wednesday, January 25, 2017
Barnga Blog
1. Confusing
2. I expected the game to have a single set of rules that everyone was going to follow, and I figured that everyone would get along and understand the game.
3. I realized something was wrong when Cora was telling us different rules than what we had and I thought that she read the rules wrong, and then Julia went to the board and started writing stuff up on it and so I knew something was wrong.
4. I just went along with the rules that I had been given and so I just started playing that way and I was authoritative.
5. We weren't able to explain what we were trying to say and we weren't able to convey our true thoughts and feelings. This created confusion and tension because we couldn't convey our true thoughts.
6. Yes I believe that it is appropriate. I think that this game shows how confusing it can be for everyone to communicate with one another effectively without getting upset with one another. This game was fun but it shows how the real world is not a game. It shows that everyone has their own way of doing things and it shows that everyone needs to except each others beliefs. This game shows how more strong willed and authoritative people will take over.
7. I don't think that this is necessary for world peace. Sure it would be nice if everyone was the same and we all could get along, but this isn't going to happen. Everyone has their own views and cultural values that they want to follow, and everyone needs to except this. Everyone needs to understand each others points of views and work out difference peacefully and this will help create more peace.
8. It shows that everyone follows a different set of "rules" or values that everyone else must except. Everyone must realize that we need to peacefully cooperate and get along to properly work things out. Everyone needs to be excepting of one another and we will be much better off.
2. I expected the game to have a single set of rules that everyone was going to follow, and I figured that everyone would get along and understand the game.
3. I realized something was wrong when Cora was telling us different rules than what we had and I thought that she read the rules wrong, and then Julia went to the board and started writing stuff up on it and so I knew something was wrong.
4. I just went along with the rules that I had been given and so I just started playing that way and I was authoritative.
5. We weren't able to explain what we were trying to say and we weren't able to convey our true thoughts and feelings. This created confusion and tension because we couldn't convey our true thoughts.
6. Yes I believe that it is appropriate. I think that this game shows how confusing it can be for everyone to communicate with one another effectively without getting upset with one another. This game was fun but it shows how the real world is not a game. It shows that everyone has their own way of doing things and it shows that everyone needs to except each others beliefs. This game shows how more strong willed and authoritative people will take over.
7. I don't think that this is necessary for world peace. Sure it would be nice if everyone was the same and we all could get along, but this isn't going to happen. Everyone has their own views and cultural values that they want to follow, and everyone needs to except this. Everyone needs to understand each others points of views and work out difference peacefully and this will help create more peace.
8. It shows that everyone follows a different set of "rules" or values that everyone else must except. Everyone must realize that we need to peacefully cooperate and get along to properly work things out. Everyone needs to be excepting of one another and we will be much better off.
Wednesday, January 11, 2017
Sociological Mindfulness
At the beginning of the video, the guy started out by trying to get you to put yourself in the shoes of a Chinese man who has come over to the United States in search of coal. He wanted you to think about how you would feel coming over and taking the coal and getting your country wealthy. Next after that he wanted you to put yourself in the shoes of a Muslim man and then in the shoes of an American soldier. He wanted you to feel the emotion and feelings of both sides, and decide where each one stands in each individual situation. He tries to get you to feel bad for the people in each situation and he tries to get you to understand why each one has done what they have. Now although I think a lot of the situations and examples are extremely radical and I do not believe they are the most valid examples, they do give a strong messaged. He uses these examples to get you to use empathy and feel what the other people are feeling. Throughout our life times I believe whether we know it or know we use empathy quite often, and we put ourselves in other peoples' shoes to feel how they feel so we can accurately decide how you should handle the situation or decide what you would do in the situation. One example of sociological mindfulness in my life would be I saw a smaller child in our school who was being picked on and made fun of. When I saw this I put myself in his situation and I thought to myself how would I feel if I was being picked on and made fun of like that. I decided I would not like that at all and I would feel awful, so I decided I would step in and help. I felt what he was feeling and I didn't like it so I stepped in and helped him in the situation. Lastly, in society I think that I fit in as a middle class person who can make a difference and impact my local community. I don't view myself as lower class or higher class but I feel that in society I fit in the middle. In society I feel that my role is to work and provide for others. I feel that I will be successful when I grow older but I don't think that I will be a stand-out name. I feel that my role in society will be to work with others to get the best possible outcome in any situation. I think that I will be more of a laid back person who goes with the flow of others, but I will also stick up for things I believe in.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)